Data for the state and national governments to prepare for USL 0.5 and 1 pilot preparations

You can move your cursor over the area you want to see the specific detailed data relevant for your states and countries.

 

Firstly, for the data (relevant for USL 0.5 and 1) that show the tight connections between the human capital (education in years of schools, cognitive skills, especially school math skill levels) vs. the economic growths beyond what the typical education economics journals integrate them together, please click here.

 

The U.S.A. data for the states and the governments

The international economic data for the World, OECD, EU, SSA, etc

 

Common Core’s Big Test: Tracking 2014-15 Results

 

NAEP data including that of Math

 

The U.S.A. data for the states and the governments (relevant for USL 0.25, 0.5 and 1)

  1. Public spending on education, total (% of GDP) worldwide (USA spends about 5.5% of GDP on the public education): you can see the dynamic data around the world that the public education spending on education per GDP converges around 5%.

  2. US State Budget (including the elementary and secondary school expenditures) Overview

  3. GDP (per capita) (in PPP) Statistics 1970-2012 from the World Bank
  4. All U.S.A. states economic data
  5. (Real) GDP per Capita by Country (& the U.S.A. states) 1980-2014 (beyond 2015 are forecasts and shaded): the default is set to the U.S.A., but you can select any country or regions or economic group´s historical data since 1980.

Some examples

This chart shows that the Public spending on education, total (% of GDP) around the world has converged to about 5-6% of the annual GDP of most nations.

 

The governmental officials of each state would like to know their per capita GDPs.

 

Annual Primary & Secondary Education Expenditures in some US states

The USL GDP growth rates hovering around 2.5% in recent years.

 

The GDP per capita in PPP growth history of the U.S.A. for 34 years and then the projections to near future

The GDP per capita in PPP growth history of the U.S.A. It rose about 4.4x over 35 years, which means about 4.3% of its annual growth rate in average.

 

The international economic data for the World, OECD, EU, SSA, etc relevant for USL1

This shows that the real GDP growth rate of the world average is about 2.5% annually.

|

 

The various GDP data from the OECD countries

  1. Public spending on education, total (% of GDP) worldwide (USA spends about 5.5% of GDP on the public education): you can see the dynamic data around the world that the public education spending on education per GDP converges around 5%.

  2. Global Expenditures on Education: you can see the dynamic data around the world that the public education spending on education per GDP converges around 5% and the OECD converges around 5.5-6%.
  3. World´s Real GDP Growth rates & GDP per capita (in PPP) from the EIU, World Bank, IMF, and the UN: this gives that the recent world Real GDP growth rates coverge to about 3% and the world Real GDP per capita coverges to about 2%.
  4. GDP (per capita) (in PPP) Statistics 1970-2012 from the World Bank: you can select all kinds of GDP releated data from any country, region averages, and the economic groups or clusters.
  5. (Real) GDP (per capita) (in PPP or not) between 1990-2015 (EIU 2015):
  6. The world region GDP growth rates and the GDP per capita in PPP
  7. (Real) GDP per Capita by Country  1980-2014 (beyond 2015 are forecasts and shaded): the default is set to the U.S.A., but you can select any country or regions or economic group´s historical data since 1980.
  8. Percent changes of Real GDP of the various economic clusters from EIU 2015

     

Google Traductor

Traductor, tradução, 번역 (predeterminado en español)

current focus on MMU x.x series

MMU1: just to uplift the math poorest half average to the math top half average, which normally would take at least 50-100 years in the average OECD nations with almost no exceptions at least according to the PISA and TIMSS math rsults 1995-2015 (and you should know that this is a revolution, not some sort of useless reforms that have been going on in the entire developed OECD nations). To reduce the hyper-skepticism, my initial target may be reducing the math poverty by 20-30% and raising the proficiency in similar manner, which still would normally take at least 30-50+ years in at least 90% of the developed countries, their states or big cities. Current focus is on the MMU1 series as the warm-up exercises as forms of pilot studies to demonstrate the math EDU revolution is not only possible in spite of the hyper-bureaucracy of the EDU establishments that simply would not any of the most breakthrough innovations in EDU and will instead keep on playing with the furitless, fancy toys of the math EDU apps and technology.

The Fundamental Premises Of USL1 And USL

USL will use the colossal cognitive capital potentials of STEM education (especially Math at the moment), because USL can make the learning 10-50 times faster and more effective than the Business As Usual typically, to trigger the equally colossal gains in the socio-economy in exchange of their willingness of the participating governments - under a new UN-led treaty hopefully - to collectively contribute the reasonable ratios of the expected surplus gains in their economies to resolve the top global crises. Each of the governments will mostly focus on resolving their crises of course, but they have to contribute to the world communities to prosper with the sustainable growths together not at the exclusion of half of the world that is poverty-stricken. USL 1 will be the fastest, easiest, and cheapest way to collectively contribute the effectively gained, USL1.0-induced surplus economy (in a sustainable manner) to resolve the most serious global crises (for all governments and the UN) based on the 5UE principles: to transition towards the resource-based, renewable energy-based, sustainable global environment and the circular economy, to help end the poverty much faster than without, while making the average people learn math and science faster and easier than prodigies. As the original USL is too fast and too disruptive (as it can literally make average people learn math and science 1,000%-50,000% times faster) to transform and people are too skeptical, we are currently focusing on only 2-5% and up to 10% at most of its capacity called USL 0.25-0.5-1.0 for the state and national governments as well as the UN.

USL1 Global Movements With Governments: 3 Steps & 3-Tier Economic Gains

STEP 1) Math Education Reform USL 0.25 at the city and USL 0.5 at the state government levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by half a year, which normally takes 10-30 years to most of the OECD countries, in just 2-3 years). STEP 2) Math Education Reform USL 0.5 at the state government levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by 1 year or more, which normally takes 2-5 decades to most of the OECD countries, in just 2-4 years). STEP 3) Math Education Reform USL 1 at the national government & the UN treaty levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by 2 years or more, which (almost) never happened to virtuallly all of the OECD member countries, in just 2-5 years). For each of the following step, we will try to create local, regional, or national Social Enterprise for each government - if they are willing as the gains are tremendous potentially - to share the profits together. So the governments will have the 3-layered benefits: ... 1) USL 0.x will enrich not only the math education that helps each USL x participating regions, 2) but also to prosper together as Social Enterprise board members of the corresponding regions. 3) once the UN gets involved, then the certain portions of the massive surpluses to their local or regional economies will be properly redistributed for the global social, energy, environmental, equality and poverty causes.